<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Usability Corner &#187; Space</title>
	<atom:link href="http://usabilitycorner.com/index.php/tag/space/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://usabilitycorner.com</link>
	<description>Some random thoughts about psychology, user experience, conscious thinking, design and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 03:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The design of the universe</title>
		<link>http://usabilitycorner.com/index.php/2009/01/12/the-design-of-the-universe/</link>
		<comments>http://usabilitycorner.com/index.php/2009/01/12/the-design-of-the-universe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Manish Vashist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usabilitycorner.com/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Serious Play 2008, astrophysicist George Smoot shows stunning new images from deep-space surveys, and prods us to ponder how the cosmos &#8212; with its giant webs of dark matter and mysterious gaping voids &#8212; got built this way.

The patterns seem universal. It seems very biological. If you compare some of the simulated videos in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At Serious Play 2008, astrophysicist George Smoot shows stunning new images from deep-space surveys, and prods us to ponder how the cosmos &#8212; with its giant webs of dark matter and mysterious gaping voids &#8212; got built this way.<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="334" height="326" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="bgColor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="flashvars" value="vu=http://video.ted.com/talks/embed/GeorgeSmoot_2008P-embed-PARTNER_high.flv&amp;su=http://images.ted.com/images/ted/tedindex/embed-posters/GeorgeSmoot-2008P.embed_thumbnail.jpg&amp;vw=320&amp;vh=240&amp;ap=0&amp;ti=404" /><param name="src" value="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="334" height="326" src="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf" flashvars="vu=http://video.ted.com/talks/embed/GeorgeSmoot_2008P-embed-PARTNER_high.flv&amp;su=http://images.ted.com/images/ted/tedindex/embed-posters/GeorgeSmoot-2008P.embed_thumbnail.jpg&amp;vw=320&amp;vh=240&amp;ap=0&amp;ti=404" bgcolor="#ffffff" wmode="transparent" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
The patterns seem universal. It seems very biological. If you compare some of the simulated videos in this presentation to our growing knowledge on complex biological systems you can see a very similar pattern. Our place in the universe, albeit infinitesimally small, is to find a way to become part of it and not cancer in it.</p>
<p>Also, I think you walk a fine line around equating emergence with intelligence. I haven&#8217;t made that equation. What I have said, and what you might have misinterpreted, is: As far as we know, &#8220;intelligence&#8221; is an emergent quality and emergence appears on all levels of existence that we can perceive.Perhaps you mistakenly extended the subset to being the full set. That I haven&#8217;t said or implied. After all, how can two humans have a discussion about something that is defined as being beyond their comprehension, and thus beyond their conversational ability. It&#8217;s called thinking in the abstract which is not beyond human comprehension or conversational ability but we&#8217;re the model for intelligence (at least until we find something else that&#8217;s smart) and so to qualify as &#8220;intelligent&#8221; it will necessarily exhibit some of the signs that we do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://usabilitycorner.com/index.php/2009/01/12/the-design-of-the-universe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

